Regulator news

PointsBet Canada accepts two-day Ontario suspension in first iGaming suspension case

Ontario's regulator and PointsBet Canada have settled the province's first proposed iGaming suspension. The operator will take its Ontario site offline for two days, down from the five the AGCO originally sought, and undergo an independent audit over its failure to flag suspicious bets tied to the Jontay Porter scheme.

CN Tower rising over Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Photo: Zwergelstern

Overview

  • On 20 October the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) and PointsBet Canada reached a settlement that ends the regulator's February 2026 suspension proceeding.
  • PointsBet agreed to a two-day suspension of its Ontario gaming site. The AGCO had originally proposed five days.
  • The operator will commission an independent audit, using an auditor and methodology approved by the AGCO, and its remediation will be independently validated.
  • The case is the first time the AGCO has moved to suspend a regulated iGaming operator in Ontario.
  • The suspension dates have not been published.

Ontario's regulator and PointsBet Canada have settled the province's first proposed iGaming suspension. The operator will take its Ontario site offline for two days, down from the five the AGCO originally sought, and undergo an independent audit over its failure to flag suspicious bets tied to the Jontay Porter scheme.

The settlement

The AGCO's 20 October notice is brief. It says the settlement resolves the proceeding that began with its February 2026 Notice of Proposed Order. Under it, PointsBet "has agreed to a two-day suspension of its Ontario gaming site." To "enhance its control environment", PointsBet will also undertake an independent audit, "using an auditor and audit methodology approved by the AGCO", and commit to addressing any findings, with the remediation independently validated. The regulator said the settlement concludes the proceeding.

Trade media reported that PointsBet had appealed the original order to Ontario's Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT). Under the settlement, the matter ends without a tribunal ruling.

Why the AGCO moved against PointsBet

The AGCO set out its case in a 12 February release, calling it "a first for Ontario's regulated igaming industry." It proposed a five-day suspension over what it described as PointsBet's "alleged systemic failure to properly monitor, detect, document and report suspicious betting patterns" linked to the 2024 bet-rigging scheme involving former Toronto Raptors player Jontay Porter.

The timeline in the AGCO release ran as follows:

  • Early 2024: After allegations of insider betting on Porter emerged, the AGCO directed all Ontario sportsbooks to confirm whether they had offered bets on Porter and whether they had detected or reported suspicious activity. According to the regulator, PointsBet said after "significant delay" that it had not offered such bets.
  • October 2025: A US Department of Justice indictment showed the Porter case was part of a wider insider-betting scheme. The AGCO required operators to reconfirm their position.
  • About 18 months after its first answer: PointsBet acknowledged for the first time that it had offered betting on Porter in the relevant games.
  • Data review: After reviewing PointsBet's wagering data, the AGCO said it confirmed indications of the suspicious betting central to the scheme. In the regulator's view, those wagers "should have been detected and reported at the time the betting occurred."

The February release also noted earlier sanctions against the operator: a monetary penalty in May 2022 for advertising and inducement violations, and another in November 2023 for breaches of Ontario's responsible gambling standards.

What it signals for Ontario operators

The final penalty is short, but the case sets a precedent in two ways.

First, the AGCO has shown it will use suspension, not only fines, against a registered iGaming operator. It has done so for an integrity-reporting failure rather than for a consumer-facing breach.

Second, the AGCO built its case on an operator's answers to regulator inquiries as well as on its monitoring systems. In its February release, the regulator described operators as "a critical first line of defense" for sports integrity. It also said timely reporting alerts leagues, integrity monitors, law enforcement and other operators worldwide. On the AGCO's account, PointsBet's inaccurate first answer and the 18-month gap before it corrected that answer were central to the case.

The independent audit condition also gives the regulator continuing oversight of PointsBet's control environment after the two days offline.

What to watch

  • The dates of the two-day suspension, which the AGCO has not yet published.
  • Whether the AGCO publishes audit findings or remediation milestones.
  • Whether other Ontario operators that offered Porter markets face scrutiny of their own reporting records.

---

Cite This Article

Topics In This Story

Related Countries

Teresa Domingo

Teresa Domingo

Teresa Domingo is an editor at AskSpinner News, turning fresh iGaming insights into engaging, accessible content. Teresa’s writing connects the latest developments with the stories behind them, aiming to give busy industry readers both a timely update and a new idea worth following.

More From This Author