Missouri files UIGEA counterclaims against Kalshi over sports event contracts
Missouri Attorney General Catherine L. Hanaway filed a 69-page answer and counterclaims against KalshiEX LLC on November 11, 2026, in *KalshiEX LLC v. Hanaway* (E.D. Mo., No. 4:26-cv-01860, ECF 26, 8:43 p.m. Central). The pleading, now in CourtListener's RECAP archive, asks District Judge Maria A. Lanahan to stop Kalshi accepting payments from Missouri residents. Kalshi sued on October 27.

Overview
- Nov. 11, 2026: Missouri Attorney General Catherine L. Hanaway filed a 69-page answer and three counterclaims against KalshiEX LLC in E.D. Mo. No. 4:26-cv-01860 (ECF 26, 8:43 p.m. CST).
- Counterclaim I (UIGEA): seeks a TRO and preliminary and permanent injunctions under 31 U.S.C. § 5365, calling unlicensed Missouri sports wagers "unlawful Internet gambling" under § 5362(10)(A) and alleging a § 5363 violation.
- Counterclaim II (MMPA): calls the offering and sale of unlicensed sports wagering an "unfair practice" under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 407.020 and seeks restitution and civil penalties of up to $1,000 per violation under § 407.100.
- Counterclaim III (public nuisance): cites State ex rel. Igoe v. Joynt (Mo. 1937) and asks the court to declare Kalshi's operation a public nuisance and enjoin it.
- Judge Maria A. Lanahan. Solicitor General Louis J. Capozzi III signed the pleading. Kalshi's preliminary-injunction reply remains due Nov. 16 under the Nov. 10 stipulation (ECF 25).
Missouri Attorney General Catherine L. Hanaway filed a 69-page answer and counterclaims against KalshiEX LLC on November 11, 2026, in KalshiEX LLC v. Hanaway (E.D. Mo., No. 4:26-cv-01860, ECF 26, 8:43 p.m. Central). The pleading, now in CourtListener's RECAP archive, asks District Judge Maria A. Lanahan to stop Kalshi accepting payments from Missouri residents. Kalshi sued on October 27.
As counter-plaintiff, the Attorney General asserts three counterclaims:
- UIGEA (Counterclaim I). The filing calls Kalshi an unlicensed "person engaged in the business of betting or wagering." It treats sports wagers by Missouri residents on Kalshi's internet platform as "unlawful Internet gambling" under 31 U.S.C. § 5362(10)(A), alleges a § 5363 violation, and seeks a temporary restraining order and preliminary and permanent injunctions under § 5365.
- Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (Counterclaim II). The state calls the sale of unlicensed sports wagering an "unfair practice" under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 407.020 and seeks an injunction, restitution, and civil penalties of up to $1,000 per violation under § 407.100.
- Public nuisance (Counterclaim III). Citing State ex rel. Igoe v. Joynt (Mo. 1937), she asks the court to declare Kalshi's operation a public nuisance and to enjoin it.
The prayer also asks the court to dismiss Kalshi's complaint with prejudice. Solicitor General Louis J. Capozzi III signed the filing. The counterclaims are allegations and have not been tested in court.
A November 10 stipulation already bars state-court or state-agency enforcement against Kalshi until final judgment or a non-voluntary dismissal of the state's state-law counterclaims. Kalshi withdrew its temporary-restraining-order request but kept its preliminary-injunction request; its reply is due November 16. The case is on AskSpinner's prediction-market litigation tracker. Related coverage: Kalshi's motion for a restraining order and Missouri's November 9 counterclaims against Novig's exchange.
Cite This Article
Topics In This Story
Related Countries
Related Topics

Kalshi and Prediction Market Litigation with US States and Tribes
Court cases between prediction market operators, US states, tribal nations and federal regulators over whether sports event contracts fall under state gambling law, from Utah and New York to Louisiana and the Seventh Circuit.

